Current:Home > ScamsAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies-LoTradeCoin
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
lotradecoin leaderboard View Date:2025-01-12 16:45:26
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (233)
Related
- When is the 'Survivor' Season 47 finale? Here's who's left; how to watch and stream part one
- Leighton Meester Reveals the Secret to “Normal” Marriage with Adam Brody
- Powerball winning numbers for Nov. 20 drawing: Jackpot rises over $300 million
- Pilot killed as small plane crashes and burns on doorstep of shopping center in Plano, Texas
- We can't get excited about 'Kraven the Hunter.' Don't blame superhero fatigue.
- Man found guilty of decapitating ex-girlfriend with samurai sword in middle of California street
- Woman sentenced to 25 years after pleading guilty in case of boy found dead in suitcase in Indiana
- Analysis: Iran-backed Yemen rebels’ helicopter-borne attack on ship raises risks in crucial Red Sea
- This house from 'Home Alone' is for sale. No, not that one.
- Turkey rules the table. But a poll finds disagreement over other Thanksgiving classics
Ranking
- See Mariah Carey and Nick Cannon's Twins Monroe and Moroccan Gift Her Flowers Onstage
- Both sides appeal ruling that Trump can stay on Colorado ballot despite insurrection finding
- Climate change hits women’s health harder. Activists want leaders to address it at COP28
- This Chilling New True Crime Series Will Change the Way You Think of Twisted Families
- Stock market today: Asian shares advance, tracking rally on Wall Street
- Padres give Mike Shildt another chance to manage 2 years after his Cardinals exit
- Prince Harry to appeal to UK government for evidence in lawsuit against Daily Mail publisher
- Taylor Swift's 'Speak Now' didn't just speak to me – it changed my life, and taught me English
Recommendation
-
Alex Jones keeps Infowars for now after judge rejects The Onion’s winning auction bid
-
Anti-abortion groups shrug off election losses, look to courts, statehouses for path forward
-
High mortgage rates push home sales decline closer to Great Recession levels
-
Taylor Swift's 'Speak Now' didn't just speak to me – it changed my life, and taught me English
-
When is the 'Survivor' Season 47 finale? Here's who's left; how to watch and stream part one
-
Capitol rioter who berated a judge and insulted a prosecutor is sentenced to 3 months in jail
-
China is expanding its crackdown on mosques to regions outside Xinjiang, Human Rights Watch says
-
Taylor Swift's 'Speak Now' didn't just speak to me – it changed my life, and taught me English